Manchester United's current situation is a rollercoaster, and the potential return of Ole Gunnar Solskjær as interim manager is the latest twist, raising serious questions about the club's strategic direction. Is this a calculated move, or a gamble that could backfire spectacularly? Let's dive in.
The spotlight is firmly on Jason Wilcox, the Director of Football, and CEO Omar Berrada, as they consider Solskjær for a second stint. This decision comes after a series of what some consider questionable choices, including the departures of Ruben Amorim, Dan Ashworth, and Erik ten Hag.
To understand the potential pitfalls, we need to revisit Solskjær's previous tenure, which ended in a chaotic autumn of 2021. Remember the 2-0 defeat against Manchester City, and the subsequent 4-1 thrashing at Watford? These were the moments that turned adoration into jeers, ultimately leading to his dismissal. The image of Solskjær in tears during his exit interview underscores his deep connection to the club, but elite football is a ruthless business.
But here's where it gets controversial...
United are struggling again, and the recent sacking of Amorim, who left the team in sixth place with 31 points (the same as Chelsea in fifth), highlights the instability. Sir Jim Ratcliffe, the club's new owner, is likely not pleased. The revolving door of managers, including Ten Hag and Ashworth, has created a sense of unease.
Wilcox, who was involved in the interview process for Ten Hag's potential replacement, and Berrada were also in place when Amorim joined. The club's missteps have become a source of amusement outside of Old Trafford. Since Sir Alex Ferguson's retirement in May 2013, United has become a soap opera, and Ratcliffe's Ineos-led project has only amplified the drama.
Could Solskjær's return be the next chapter? Wilcox and Berrada would likely point to Solskjær's successful interim period from December 2018 to March 2019. In 19 games, he secured 14 wins, 2 draws, and only 3 losses, going unbeaten in his first 11 matches. This period brought a much-needed lift after José Mourinho's tenure, including a memorable Champions League victory against Paris Saint-Germain.
Wilcox and Berrada are hoping for a repeat performance. They believe Solskjær's positive attitude and cult-hero status will revitalize the squad and reconnect with the club's attacking tradition.
And this is the part most people miss...
However, what happens if results don't improve? The nightmare scenario of the Watford defeat could resurface, with fan fury directed at the interim manager and the decision-makers. History suggests this is a real possibility. After signing a three-year deal in March 2019, Solskjær's performance declined, with 6 losses in his last 10 matches.
Despite moments of success, including creditable finishes and a Europa League final appearance, there were also periods of crisis. Solskjær's United never truly had a sense of calm, and a repeat of this volatility could be on the cards.
Solskjær will aim to recapture that initial positivity. However, there's a risk that United's season could unravel further, increasing their laughingstock status, leaving the executives scrambling for explanations.
Should Solskjær return, and perhaps with Michael Carrick as his assistant, he'll be aiming for the full-time job. The list of potential summer appointments is extensive, including names like Oliver Glasner, and Thomas Tuchel.
Here's a thought-provoking question: If Solskjær leads United back into the Champions League or wins the FA Cup, would he really be removed again?
At Manchester United, anything is possible. What do you think? Is this a risk worth taking? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
